Github user gerlowskija commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/425#discussion_r204601140
--- Diff:
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/cloud/TestPullReplicaErrorHandling.java ---
@@ -151,12 +151,14 @@ public void testCantConnectToPullReplica() throws
Exception {
assertNumDocs(10 + i, leaderClient);
}
}
- try (HttpSolrClient pullReplicaClient =
getHttpSolrClient(s.getReplicas(EnumSet.of(Replica.Type.PULL)).get(0).getCoreUrl()))
{
- pullReplicaClient.query(new
SolrQuery("*:*")).getResults().getNumFound();
- fail("Shouldn't be able to query the pull replica");
- } catch (SolrServerException e) {
- //expected
- }
+
+ SolrServerException e = expectThrows(SolrServerException.class, ()
-> {
+ try(HttpSolrClient pullReplicaClient =
getHttpSolrClient(s.getReplicas(EnumSet.of(Replica.Type.PULL)).get(0).getCoreUrl()))
{
+ pullReplicaClient.query(new
SolrQuery("*:*")).getResults().getNumFound();
+ }
+ });
+ assertTrue("Shouldn't be able to query the pull replica",
e.getMessage().contains("refused connection"));
--- End diff --
[-1] I like the idea, and agree this is a good assertion to add, but I'd
rather not add it in this PR since it's intended to be a pure refactor. Would
you mind removing this assertion?
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
