[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16586321#comment-16586321
]
Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-12593:
-----------------------------------
bq. Before modifying the default config, I just want to get one other person's
consent as it's so widely used. Steve Rowe does the recommendation above sound
good to you?: adding those 3 additional date patterns to the set of those in
the parse-date URP in the default configSet?
+1. The date patterns in the default configSet were intented to cover the most
likely uses. I didn't do a survey or anything, it was just a guess. So IMHO
augmenting with well-known patterns is a good idea.
RFC-1036 is Usenet-style, and RFC-1123 is Email-style, right? What do you mean
by "ANSI-C"?
> Remove date parsing functionality from extraction contrib
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12593
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12593
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: contrib - Solr Cell (Tika extraction)
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: master (8.0)
>
>
> The date parsing functionality in the extraction contrib is obsoleted by
> equivalent functionality in ParseDateFieldUpdateProcessorFactory. It should
> be removed. We should add documentation within this part of the ref guide on
> how to accomplish the same (and test it).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
