[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16658534#comment-16658534
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-12638:
-------------------------------------

I think it's very sketchy for Solr to do either (1) or (2).  I think the user 
should (somehow) provide the root ID, which would only modify your example 
slightly.  Thus this is (3)?  One option is to provide the {{\_root\_}} field 
in the document being updated.  The only thing I don't like about this is that 
this would be the very first time that a user has to actually use this field in 
any way; normally the field is an internal implementation detail.  Granted we 
don't hide the detail at all, so it's not a leap to ask the user to use this in 
this advanced case.  Or, perhaps we insist the user send a {{\_route\_}} 
parameter to /update which is otherwise only used in searches?

BTW your last paragraph... IMO we don't have a problem with URP ordering (IMO). 
 It's already quite wrong to order DURP after RUP.  My concern loosely 
expressed in my previous comment is broadly about UpdateLog integration.

> Support atomic updates of nested/child documents for nested-enabled schema
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-12638
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12638
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: mosh
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: SOLR-12638-delete-old-block-no-commit.patch, 
> SOLR-12638-nocommit.patch
>
>          Time Spent: 4h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I have been toying with the thought of using this transformer in conjunction 
> with NestedUpdateProcessor and AtomicUpdate to allow SOLR to completely 
> re-index the entire nested structure. This is just a thought, I am still 
> thinking about implementation details. Hopefully I will be able to post a 
> more concrete proposal soon.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to