[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16658983#comment-16658983
]
mosh commented on SOLR-12638:
-----------------------------
{quote}Or, perhaps we insist the user send a _route_ parameter to /update which
is otherwise only used in searches?{quote}
I like this option a lot better, since it makes the updated doc look cleaner.
Adding another field to the update command can seem a little confusing IMO,
since that field is not used to update the document in any way.
I just pushed a commit implementing this.
> Support atomic updates of nested/child documents for nested-enabled schema
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12638
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12638
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: mosh
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-12638-delete-old-block-no-commit.patch,
> SOLR-12638-nocommit.patch
>
> Time Spent: 4h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I have been toying with the thought of using this transformer in conjunction
> with NestedUpdateProcessor and AtomicUpdate to allow SOLR to completely
> re-index the entire nested structure. This is just a thought, I am still
> thinking about implementation details. Hopefully I will be able to post a
> more concrete proposal soon.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
