[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16735512#comment-16735512
]
mosh commented on SOLR-12888:
-----------------------------
{quote}I think both tests are the same in this respect? At least this patch
makes them the same – both use the URP implicitly. Or am I missing
something?{quote}
Scratch that, I misread the diffs.
{quote}RE putIfAbsent vs computeIfAbsent: sure; I'll make this change. Yeah
it's very minor but might as well.{quote}
Yeah, it is a minor detail but it does not take much effort.
Glad to know it made the cut.
> NestedUpdateProcessor code should activate automatically in 8.0
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12888
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12888
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: master (8.0)
>
> Attachments: SOLR-12888.patch
>
>
> If the schema supports it, the NestedUpdateProcessor URP should be registered
> automatically somehow. The Factory for this already looks for the existence
> of certain special fields in the schema, so that's good. But the URP Factory
> needs to be added to your chain in any of the ways we support that. _In 8.0
> the user shouldn't have to do anything to their solrconfig._
> We might un-URP this and call directly somewhere. Or perhaps we might add a
> special named URP chain (needn't document), defined automatically, that
> activates at RunURP. Perhaps other things could be added to this in the
> future.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
