[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16741550#comment-16741550
]
Tomoko Uchida commented on LUCENE-2562:
---------------------------------------
bq. Forbiddenapis should not allow this, so where does it happen? Inside Guice?
Without {{--add-opens}} option, JDK complains as follows when launching Luke:
{code:java}
WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred
WARNING: Illegal reflective access by
com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$1
(file:/tmp/lucene-8.0.0-SNAPSHOT/luke/lib/guice-4.1.0.jar) to method
java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(java.lang.String,byte[],int,int,java.security.ProtectionDomain)
WARNING: Please consider reporting this to the maintainers of
com.google.inject.internal.cglib.core.$ReflectUtils$1
WARNING: Use --illegal-access=warn to enable warnings of further illegal
reflective access operations
WARNING: All illegal access operations will be denied in a future release
{code}
It occurs inside cglib and there is an issue about this.
[https://github.com/google/guice/issues/1133]
Discussion is open but seems there is no clear answer from Guice developers.
Should we remove the dependency to Guice / cglib?
> Make Luke a Lucene/Solr Module
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2562
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2562
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Priority: Major
> Labels: gsoc2014
> Attachments: LUCENE-2562-Ivy.patch, LUCENE-2562-Ivy.patch,
> LUCENE-2562-Ivy.patch, LUCENE-2562-ivy.patch, LUCENE-2562.patch,
> LUCENE-2562.patch, Luke-ALE-1.png, Luke-ALE-2.png, Luke-ALE-3.png,
> Luke-ALE-4.png, Luke-ALE-5.png, luke-javafx1.png, luke-javafx2.png,
> luke-javafx3.png, luke1.jpg, luke2.jpg, luke3.jpg, lukeALE-documents.png,
> スクリーンショット 2018-11-05 9.19.47.png
>
> Time Spent: 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> see
> "RE: Luke - in need of maintainer":
> http://markmail.org/message/m4gsto7giltvrpuf
> "Web-based Luke": http://markmail.org/message/4xwps7p7ifltme5q
> I think it would be great if there was a version of Luke that always worked
> with trunk - and it would also be great if it was easier to match Luke jars
> with Lucene versions.
> While I'd like to get GWT Luke into the mix as well, I think the easiest
> starting point is to straight port Luke to another UI toolkit before
> abstracting out DTO objects that both GWT Luke and Pivot Luke could share.
> I've started slowly converting Luke's use of thinlet to Apache Pivot. I
> haven't/don't have a lot of time for this at the moment, but I've plugged
> away here and there over the past work or two. There is still a *lot* to do.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
