I've back ported the commit. Just running the tests now and will commit as soon as the tests pass.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 12:34 AM jim ferenczi <jim.feren...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree, let's respin today and initiate a new vote. Do we have a > volunteer for the backport or should I do it ? > > Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 09:03, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> Since there is already a fix as Tomás mentioned, can someone backport >> it to branch_8_0 so that we can try to get a new RC out today? >> >> @Ishan Chattopadhyaya No worry at all, thanks for taking care of >> getting 7.7.1 out. >> >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 8:24 AM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >> wrote: >> > >> > Having done these releases more than a few times, I completely >> understand the frustration caused by such delays but I think that >> SOLR-13285 is something that really breaks Solr in a major version release. >> We can always have a 8.0.1 release that fixes it but I feel like it would >> not be a good thing to offer an 8.0.0 version to end-users knowing that it >> would cause issues for anyone using enum fields. >> > >> > I am sorry that it would require more time and effort at the end of the >> RM but In my opinion, this is worth a respin. >> > >> > Anshum >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:52 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> In case we go through with this RC, I can volunteer to release a 8.0.1 >> (with SOLR-13285) immediately after 8.0.0 release. >> >> @Adrien, Jim, I really understand the frustrations of an RM, and I >> also apologize for the delay I caused to this release due to the >> intermediate 7.7.1 release where I didn't do it as quickly as I could have >> (delay in building the RC, delay in backporting the backward compatibility >> indexes etc). >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:52 AM Tomás Fernández Löbbe < >> tomasflo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> I understand the frustration with the delay and the number of >> respins, and I don't want to be disrespectful of Jim's time as RC, but from >> what I can see, SOLR-13285 would prevent anyone with enum fields to use >> Solr 8.0, and the fix is already available. >> >>> >> >>> -0 >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 2:14 PM Nhat Nguyen >> >>> <nhat.ngu...@elastic.co.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:54:05.261238] >> >>>> >> >>>> > On Mar 7, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>> > >> >>>> > +1 SUCCESS! [1:25:54.239684] >> >>>> > >> >>>> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:53 PM jim ferenczi <jim...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> Please vote for release candidate 3 for Lucene/Solr 8.0.0 >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e >> >>>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> >>>> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.0.0-RC3-reva9d80bf18af04850ea21dcf88a40367559fb246e >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> Here’s my +1 >> >>>> >> SUCCESS! [1:14:08.843490] >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > -- >> >>>> > Adrien >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>>> >> >> >> -- >> Adrien >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>
