[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13088743#comment-13088743 ]
David Mark Nemeskey commented on LUCENE-3391: --------------------------------------------- (1) I was also hesitant to add the generics, because I wasn't sure about the warnings it gave. So I'll remove that happily. (2) And I guess the method parameter in queryNorm? (3) I'm pretty bad at naming things, so I'd take your advice in this. :) Is BasicSimilarityProvider OK? > Make EasySimilarityProvider a full-fledged class > ------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-3391 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3391 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: core/query/scoring, general/javadocs > Reporter: David Mark Nemeskey > Assignee: David Mark Nemeskey > Labels: gsoc, gsoc2011, rank, similarity > Fix For: flexscoring branch > > Attachments: LUCENE-3391.patch, LUCENE-3391.patch, LUCENE-3391.patch > > Original Estimate: 1h > Remaining Estimate: 1h > > The {{EasySimilarityProvider}} in {{TestEasySimilarity}} would be a good > candidate for a full-fledged class. Both {{DefaultSimilarity}} and > {{BM25Similarity}} have their own providers, which are effectively the > same,so I don't see why we couldn't add one generic provider for convenience. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org