[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16884904#comment-16884904 ]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8811: -------------------------------------- I was reviewing the changelog for 8.2, this change looks a bit too breaking for a minor and should probably wait for 9.0? We can separately address LUCENE-8810 by disabling the flattening of disjunctions if the new BooleanQuery would have more than 1024 clauses? > Add maximum clause count check to IndexSearcher rather than BooleanQuery > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-8811 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Adrien Grand > Assignee: Alan Woodward > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 8.2 > > Attachments: LUCENE-8811.patch, LUCENE-8811.patch, LUCENE-8811.patch, > LUCENE-8811.patch, LUCENE-8811.patch, LUCENE-8811.patch > > > Currently we only check whether boolean queries have too many clauses. > However there are other ways that queries may have too many clauses, for > instance if you have boolean queries that have themselves inner boolean > queries. > Could we use the new Query visitor API to move this check from BooleanQuery > to IndexSearcher in order to make this check more consistent across queries? > See for instance LUCENE-8810 where a rewrite rule caused the maximum clause > count to be hit even though the total number of leaf queries remained the > same. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org