[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16885121#comment-16885121 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-8811: --------------------------------------------------------- Commit 607c46c9979899f9ef701ae501fd273ce4f0f555 in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/master from Adrien Grand [ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=607c46c ] LUCENE-8811: Undo removal of deprecations. > Add maximum clause count check to IndexSearcher rather than BooleanQuery > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: LUCENE-8811 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8811 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Adrien Grand > Assignee: Alan Woodward > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 8.2 > > Attachments: LUCENE-8811.patch, LUCENE-8811.patch, LUCENE-8811.patch, > LUCENE-8811.patch, LUCENE-8811.patch, LUCENE-8811.patch > > > Currently we only check whether boolean queries have too many clauses. > However there are other ways that queries may have too many clauses, for > instance if you have boolean queries that have themselves inner boolean > queries. > Could we use the new Query visitor API to move this check from BooleanQuery > to IndexSearcher in order to make this check more consistent across queries? > See for instance LUCENE-8810 where a rewrite rule caused the maximum clause > count to be hit even though the total number of leaf queries remained the > same. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.14#76016) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org