While back porting LUCENE-9350, I ran into needing LUCENE-9349[1] which 
introduces a small API change to QueryVisitor. Do we think this is acceptable 
in a bug fix release, or do I need to figure out how to back port the changes 
without it?

[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9349

On 2020/05/07 18:30:53, Alan Woodward <[email protected]> wrote: 
> +1, thanks for volunteering Mike
> 
> > On 7 May 2020, at 19:03, Anshum Gupta <[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > 
> > Thanks for doing this, Mike. 
> > +1 to the 8.5.2 release. 
> > 
> > On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 10:13 AM Mike Drob <[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > Devs,
> > 
> > I know that we had 8.5.1 only a few weeks ago, but with the fix for 
> > LUCENE-9350 I think we should consider another bug-fix. I know that without 
> > it I will be explicitly recommending several users to stay off of 8.5.x on 
> > their upgrade plans. There are some pretty scary looking charts on 
> > SOLR-14428 that describe the impact of the bug in more detail.
> > 
> > I'd be happy to volunteer as RM for this, would probably be looking at 
> > trying to get it a vote started sometime next week.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Mike
> > 
> > 
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14428 
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14428>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9350 
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9350>
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Anshum Gupta
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to