On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 3:41 PM Bram Van Dam <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 10/05/2020 08:20, David Smiley wrote: > > An idea just occurred to me that may help make a split nicer for Solr > > than it is today. Solr could use a branch of the Lucene project that's > > used for the Solr project. > > Maybe I'm alone in this, but (better) Lucene compatibility is one of the > reasons why our company chose Solr over ElasticSearch.
I though about this for a while and I do wonder if you could elaborate on what makes Solr have a better compatibility with Lucene. That's certainly something elasticsearch would want to catch up on since it sounds like a clear benefit for users. Maybe I just misunderstood what you meant hence couldn't make much sense out of it. simon > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
