-1 (binding) On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 7:31 AM Alan Woodward <romseyg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Alan Woodward > > > On 12 May 2020, at 12:06, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Jan Høydahl > > > >> 12. mai 2020 kl. 09:36 skrev Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com>: > >> > >> Dear Lucene and Solr developers! > >> > >> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am > >> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache > >> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two > >> independent entities. > >> > >> To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems > >> like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10 > >> years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and > >> exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers, > >> patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make > >> development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP. > >> > >> We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a > >> chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The > >> discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the > >> matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are > >> against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I > >> don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible -- > >> we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I > >> firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put > >> it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the > >> future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me. > >> > >> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and > >> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC, > >> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be > >> worked out during the process if the decision passes. > >> > >> Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines): > >> > >> [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal > >> [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal > >> > >> Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to > >> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding > >> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please). > >> > >> The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read > >> and cast a vote. > >> > >> Dawid > >> > >> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > >> [2] > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
