+1 binding Sent from a mobile device
> On 12. May 2020, at 13:33, Jason Gerlowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > -1 (binding) > >> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 7:31 AM Alan Woodward <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> Alan Woodward >> >>>> On 12 May 2020, at 12:06, Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Jan Høydahl >>> >>>> 12. mai 2020 kl. 09:36 skrev Dawid Weiss <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers! >>>> >>>> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am >>>> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache >>>> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two >>>> independent entities. >>>> >>>> To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems >>>> like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10 >>>> years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and >>>> exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers, >>>> patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make >>>> development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP. >>>> >>>> We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a >>>> chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The >>>> discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the >>>> matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are >>>> against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I >>>> don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible -- >>>> we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I >>>> firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put >>>> it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the >>>> future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me. >>>> >>>> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and >>>> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC, >>>> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be >>>> worked out during the process if the decision passes. >>>> >>>> Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines): >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal >>>> [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal >>>> >>>> Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to >>>> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding >>>> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please). >>>> >>>> The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read >>>> and cast a vote. >>>> >>>> Dawid >>>> >>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>>> [2] >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
