+1 (binding) Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer nkn...@apache.org
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:02 AM Namgyu Kim <kng0...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:33 PM Tommaso Teofili < > tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Tommaso >> >> On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 09:37, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers! >>> >>> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am >>> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache >>> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two >>> independent entities. >>> >>> To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems >>> like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10 >>> years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and >>> exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers, >>> patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make >>> development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP. >>> >>> We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a >>> chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The >>> discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the >>> matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are >>> against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I >>> don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible -- >>> we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I >>> firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put >>> it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the >>> future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me. >>> >>> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and >>> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC, >>> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be >>> worked out during the process if the decision passes. >>> >>> Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines): >>> >>> [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal >>> [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal >>> >>> Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to >>> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding >>> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please). >>> >>> The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read >>> and cast a vote. >>> >>> Dawid >>> >>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>> [2] >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >>>
