+1 (binding) Kevin Risden
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:17 PM Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Nicholas Knize, Ph.D., GISP > Geospatial Software Guy | Elasticsearch > Apache Lucene PMC Member and Committer > nkn...@apache.org > > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:02 AM Namgyu Kim <kng0...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:33 PM Tommaso Teofili < >> tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> Tommaso >>> >>> On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 09:37, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear Lucene and Solr developers! >>>> >>>> According to an earlier [DISCUSS] thread on the dev list [2], I am >>>> calling for a vote on the proposal to make Solr a top-level Apache >>>> project (TLP) and separate Lucene and Solr development into two >>>> independent entities. >>>> >>>> To quickly recap the reasons and consequences of such a move: it seems >>>> like the reasons for the initial merge of Lucene and Solr, around 10 >>>> years ago, have been achieved. Both projects are in good shape and >>>> exhibit signs of independence already (mailing lists, committers, >>>> patch flow). There are many technical considerations that would make >>>> development much easier if we move Solr out into its own TLP. >>>> >>>> We discussed this issue [2] and both PMC members and committers had a >>>> chance to review all the pros and cons and express their views. The >>>> discussion showed that there are clearly different opinions on the >>>> matter - some people are in favor, some are neutral, others are >>>> against or not seeing the point of additional labor. Realistically, I >>>> don't think reaching 100% level consensus is going to be possible -- >>>> we are a diverse bunch with different opinions and personalities. I >>>> firmly believe this is the right direction hence the decision to put >>>> it under the voting process. Should something take a wrong turn in the >>>> future (as some folks worry it may), all blame is on me. >>>> >>>> Therefore, the proposal is to separate Solr from under Lucene TLP, and >>>> make it a TLP on its own. The initial structure of the new PMC, >>>> committer base, git repositories and other managerial aspects can be >>>> worked out during the process if the decision passes. >>>> >>>> Please indicate one of the following (see [1] for guidelines): >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 - yes, I vote for the proposal >>>> [ ] -1 - no, I vote against the proposal >>>> >>>> Please note that anyone in the Lucene+Solr community is invited to >>>> express their opinion, though only Lucene+Solr committers cast binding >>>> votes (indicate non-binding votes in your reply, please). >>>> >>>> The vote will be active for a week to give everyone a chance to read >>>> and cast a vote. >>>> >>>> Dawid >>>> >>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>>> [2] >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfae2440264f6f874e91545b2030c98e7b7e3854ddf090f7747d338df%40%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>> >>>>
