FYI I volunteered to do the docker 8.6.1 release already: https://github.com/docker-solr/docker-solr/issues/328#issuecomment-666494362
I recommend other committers interested in docker "Watch" that repo, just as you probably do for lucene-solr. ~ David Smiley Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 11:49 PM Houston Putman <[email protected]> wrote: > Its a manual process, but there are scripts available in the docker-solr > repo to do it. > > The releases also have to be verified by the docker folks, but i think > that goes pretty quickly. > > Ill make sure to get that process kicked off whenever the release gets > cemented. > > - Houston > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 6:13 PM Marcus Eagan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> I agree with Ishan on the need for the Docker image check. It’s an >> additional burden but most people are deploying Solr as a container these >> days. >> >> Marcus >> >> On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 13:18 Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> For some reason, 8.6.0 docker images are not generated and pushed. After >>> the 8.6.1 release, can we ensure that the docker images are pushed? Any >>> idea how does that happen, generally? >>> Can we add this as a step in the release process please? >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 2:47 AM Houston Putman <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> The first RC has been pushed and the vote has been started. >>>> >>>> Release note drafts can be found here: >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/ReleaseNote861 >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNote861 >>>> >>>> Any changes can be made there directly. >>>> >>>> - Houston >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:51 AM Houston Putman < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ok, I'm finalizing the 8.6.1 release, so please do not push any >>>>> commits unless there is a large bug we have not yet identified. >>>>> >>>>> I'll be sending out the RC1 later today. >>>>> >>>>> - Houston >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:41 AM Atri Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> This seems like a patch release for targeting a specific blocking >>>>>> issue in 8.6. 8.7 would seem over arching? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 20:33, Houston Putman <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I started the process last night. Is there a reason why you want >>>>>>> this to make it into 8.6.1 and not 8.7? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Houston >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 8:13 AM Noble Paul <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can I cherry-pick SOLR-14634: Limit the HTTP security headers to >>>>>>>> "/solr" end point ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> if the build is not already made? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 4:14 AM David Smiley <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > I have a PR up: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1706 >>>>>>>> reviews welcome; I won't merge to a release branch without one. >>>>>>>> > ~ David Smiley >>>>>>>> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>>>>>>> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:43 AM Houston Putman < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> Thanks Jan and David. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> I think that's the last issue. So after you commit it I'll begin >>>>>>>> the release process. >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> - Houston >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:29 AM David Smiley < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9443 >>>>>>>> >>> This regression on the highlighter is trivial; just revert a >>>>>>>> commit to a file and maybe suppress a warning. I'll get this into >>>>>>>> 8.6.1 >>>>>>>> today. >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> ~ David Smiley >>>>>>>> >>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>>>>>>> >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 6:04 AM Jan Høydahl < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> Merged! >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> 28. jul. 2020 kl. 23:22 skrev Houston Putman < >>>>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> +1 to the change. >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> I think the last issue remaining is Jan's Zookeeper client >>>>>>>> port fix. After that is merged I will start with the release. >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> - Houston >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:12 PM Gus Heck <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> Ishan suggested I also supply the slight clarification to ref >>>>>>>> guide build docs to 8_6 >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1704 if you want to >>>>>>>> include it. >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:25 PM Houston Putman < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> Both of those look good to include! >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> Ill keep an eye out for when they get resolved. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> - Houston >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:16 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can we include SOLR-11611 for 8.6.1? The patch should be >>>>>>>> simple to test out (with someone having a Windows machine and VM) and >>>>>>>> seems >>>>>>>> like a good one to fix. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I marked it as a 8.6.1 bug, but please feel free to unmark >>>>>>>> it (or I can do so, if you tell me to) if you feel otherwise. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:40 AM Jan Høydahl < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Came back from holiday and fixed >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14671 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can we include it in 8.6.1? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 27. jul. 2020 kl. 22:56 skrev Houston Putman < >>>>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Added upgrade notes for the autoscaling stuff. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Will begin the release process tomorrow when my GPG Keys >>>>>>>> will be refreshed in all of the apache systems. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Houston >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Gus Heck < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Doc changes are in. Still having trouble with that one >>>>>>>> link in 8x but just fixed it locally and made sure not to push that >>>>>>>> change. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:57 PM Gus Heck < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 8x docs not building smoothly on my laptop... (without >>>>>>>> changes) troubleshooting, checking deps listed in README.adoc, etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:50 AM Houston Putman < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, push it to branch_8_6. I have to document the >>>>>>>> upgrade notes for the autoscaling stuff anyways. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:27 AM Gus Heck < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I realized after I went looking for it in the new docs >>>>>>>> that I didn't actually push the doc changes for MOVEREPLICA to 8x (had >>>>>>>> intended to verify that nothing differed in 8x before pushing). Doing >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> now, and suspect that we probably want to include it for 8.6.1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:20 PM Varun Thacker < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > does the default autoscaling policy stay once they >>>>>>>> have upgraded? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking at >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/8e0eae2/#diff-de88ca16848af57d2474e04e26ea462cR90 >>>>>>>> , it seems like just upgrading to Solr 8.6.1 will be enough. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:51 PM Houston Putman < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it looks like we all agree that 8.6.1 should be >>>>>>>> cut to fix this issue. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless there's any alternatives proposed, early next >>>>>>>> week I'm going to push my branch_8_6 that has the offending commits >>>>>>>> reverted and some additional documentation on reverting the defaulted >>>>>>>> autoscaling policy from 8.6.0. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then I'll start the release process for 8.6.1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please speak up if there is any disagreement. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Houston >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:40 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely, Ilan! Good idea. I initially hesitated >>>>>>>> in doing so because Andrzej had a workaround in mind for them, so I >>>>>>>> thought >>>>>>>> it would be better if he did this. But, it makes sense to inform them >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> the issue right away anyway. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Jul, 2020, 11:42 pm Ilan Ginzburg, < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shouldn't we add a note right away to 8.6 >>>>>>>> notifying of the issue? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 22 juil. 2020 à 20:08, Atri Sharma < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> a écrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks Houston. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:51 PM Houston Putman < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > If we agree that this warrants a patch release, >>>>>>>> I volunteer to do the release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I do think a patch release is reasonable even >>>>>>>> if users have to take an action when upgrading from 8.6.0. I imagine >>>>>>>> most >>>>>>>> users haven't upgraded to 8.6.0 yet, so if we make the patch now we >>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>> make life easier for everyone that upgrades between now and when 8.7 is >>>>>>>> released. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:50 PM Atri Sharma < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Ignore this, I misread your email. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:11 PM Atri Sharma < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Should we not revert the change so that >>>>>>>> users upgrading from 8.6 to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > 8.6.1 get the earlier default policy? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:09 PM Houston >>>>>>>> Putman <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > Question about the change. Since this >>>>>>>> patch added a default autoscaling policy, if users upgrade to 8.6 and >>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>> 8.6.1, does the default autoscaling policy stay once they have >>>>>>>> upgraded? If >>>>>>>> so we probably want to include instructions in the release notes on >>>>>>>> how to >>>>>>>> fix this issue once upgrading. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > - Houston >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:53 AM Ishan >>>>>>>> Chattopadhyaya <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> There was a performance regression >>>>>>>> identified in 8.6.0 release due to SOLR-12845. I think it is serious >>>>>>>> enough >>>>>>>> to warrant an immediate bug fix release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> I propose a 8.6.1 release. Unfortunately, >>>>>>>> I'll be unable to volunteer for this release owning to some other >>>>>>>> commitments, however Andrzej mentioned in Slack that he might be able >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> volunteer for this post 27th. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Are there any thoughts/concerns regarding >>>>>>>> this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Ishan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Atri >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Apache Concerted >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Atri >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Apache Concerted >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Atri >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Concerted >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work) >>>>>>>> >>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play) >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> Noble Paul >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Atri >>>>>> Apache Concerted >>>>>> >>>>> -- >> Marcus Eagan >> >>
