I agree with Ishan on the need for the Docker image check. It’s an
additional burden but most people are deploying Solr as a container these
days.

Marcus

On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 13:18 Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> For some reason, 8.6.0 docker images are not generated and pushed. After
> the 8.6.1 release, can we ensure that the docker images are pushed? Any
> idea how does that happen, generally?
> Can we add this as a step in the release process please?
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 2:47 AM Houston Putman <houstonput...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> The first RC has been pushed and the vote has been started.
>>
>> Release note drafts can be found here:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/ReleaseNote861
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNote861
>>
>> Any changes can be made there directly.
>>
>> - Houston
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:51 AM Houston Putman <houstonput...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I'm finalizing the 8.6.1 release, so please do not push any commits
>>> unless there is a large bug we have not yet identified.
>>>
>>> I'll be sending out the RC1 later today.
>>>
>>> - Houston
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:41 AM Atri Sharma <a...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This seems like a patch release for targeting a specific blocking issue
>>>> in 8.6. 8.7 would seem over arching?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 20:33, Houston Putman <houstonput...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I started the process last night. Is there a reason why you want this
>>>>> to make it into 8.6.1 and not 8.7?
>>>>>
>>>>> - Houston
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 8:13 AM Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Can I cherry-pick SOLR-14634: Limit the HTTP security headers to
>>>>>> "/solr" end point ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if the build is not already made?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 4:14 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I have a PR up: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1706
>>>>>> reviews welcome; I won't merge to a release branch without one.
>>>>>> > ~ David Smiley
>>>>>> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>>>>>> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:43 AM Houston Putman <
>>>>>> houstonput...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Thanks Jan and David.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I think that's the last issue. So after you commit it I'll begin
>>>>>> the release process.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> - Houston
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 10:29 AM David Smiley <dsmi...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9443
>>>>>> >>> This regression on the highlighter is trivial; just revert a
>>>>>> commit to a file and maybe suppress a warning.  I'll get this into 8.6.1
>>>>>> today.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> ~ David Smiley
>>>>>> >>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>>>>>> >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 6:04 AM Jan Høydahl <
>>>>>> jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> Merged!
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> 28. jul. 2020 kl. 23:22 skrev Houston Putman <
>>>>>> houstonput...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> +1 to the change.
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> I think the last issue remaining is Jan's Zookeeper client port
>>>>>> fix. After that is merged I will start with the release.
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> - Houston
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:12 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> Ishan suggested I also supply the slight clarification to ref
>>>>>> guide build docs to 8_6
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/1704 if you want to
>>>>>> include it.
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:25 PM Houston Putman <
>>>>>> houstonput...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>> Both of those look good to include!
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>> Ill keep an eye out for when they get resolved.
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>> - Houston
>>>>>> >>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 9:16 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can we include SOLR-11611 for 8.6.1? The patch should be
>>>>>> simple to test out (with someone having a Windows machine and VM) and 
>>>>>> seems
>>>>>> like a good one to fix.
>>>>>> >>>>>>> I marked it as a 8.6.1 bug, but please feel free to unmark it
>>>>>> (or I can do so, if you tell me to) if you feel otherwise.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:40 AM Jan Høydahl <
>>>>>> jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Came back from holiday and fixed
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14671
>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can we include it in 8.6.1?
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 27. jul. 2020 kl. 22:56 skrev Houston Putman <
>>>>>> houstonput...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Added upgrade notes for the autoscaling stuff.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Will begin the release process tomorrow when my GPG Keys
>>>>>> will be refreshed in all of the apache systems.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Houston
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Doc changes are in. Still having trouble with that one link
>>>>>> in 8x but just fixed it locally and made sure not to push that change.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:57 PM Gus Heck <
>>>>>> gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 8x docs not building smoothly on my laptop... (without
>>>>>> changes) troubleshooting, checking deps listed in README.adoc, etc.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:50 AM Houston Putman <
>>>>>> houstonput...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, push it to branch_8_6. I have to document the
>>>>>> upgrade notes for the autoscaling stuff anyways.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:27 AM Gus Heck <
>>>>>> gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I realized after I went looking for it in the new docs
>>>>>> that I didn't actually push the doc changes for MOVEREPLICA to 8x (had
>>>>>> intended to verify that nothing differed in 8x before pushing). Doing 
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> now, and suspect that we probably want to include it for 8.6.1
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:20 PM Varun Thacker <
>>>>>> va...@vthacker.in> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > does the default autoscaling policy stay once they
>>>>>> have upgraded?
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking at
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/8e0eae2/#diff-de88ca16848af57d2474e04e26ea462cR90
>>>>>> , it seems like just upgrading to Solr 8.6.1 will be enough.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:51 PM Houston Putman <
>>>>>> houstonput...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So it looks like we all agree that 8.6.1 should be cut
>>>>>> to fix this issue.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless there's any alternatives proposed, early next
>>>>>> week I'm going to push my branch_8_6 that has the offending commits
>>>>>> reverted and some additional documentation on reverting the defaulted
>>>>>> autoscaling policy from 8.6.0.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then I'll start the release process for 8.6.1.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please speak up if there is any disagreement.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Houston
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:40 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>>>>>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Absolutely, Ilan! Good idea. I initially hesitated in
>>>>>> doing so because Andrzej had a workaround in mind for them, so I thought 
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> would be better if he did this. But, it makes sense to inform them of the
>>>>>> issue right away anyway.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Jul, 2020, 11:42 pm Ilan Ginzburg, <
>>>>>> ilans...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shouldn't we add a note right away to 8.6 notifying
>>>>>> of the issue?
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 22 juil. 2020 à 20:08, Atri Sharma <
>>>>>> a...@apache.org> a écrit :
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks Houston.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:51 PM Houston Putman <
>>>>>> houstonput...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > If we agree that this warrants a patch release, I
>>>>>> volunteer to do the release.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I do think a patch release is reasonable even if
>>>>>> users have to take an action when upgrading from 8.6.0. I imagine most
>>>>>> users haven't upgraded to 8.6.0 yet, so if we make the patch now we will
>>>>>> make life easier for everyone that upgrades between now and when 8.7 is
>>>>>> released.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 12:50 PM Atri Sharma <
>>>>>> a...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Ignore this, I misread your email.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:11 PM Atri Sharma <
>>>>>> a...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Should we not revert the change so that users
>>>>>> upgrading from 8.6 to
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > 8.6.1 get the earlier default policy?
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 9:09 PM Houston Putman
>>>>>> <houstonput...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > +1
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > Question about the change. Since this patch
>>>>>> added a default autoscaling policy, if users upgrade to 8.6 and then 
>>>>>> 8.6.1,
>>>>>> does the default autoscaling policy stay once they have upgraded? If so 
>>>>>> we
>>>>>> probably want to include instructions in the release notes on how to fix
>>>>>> this issue once upgrading.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > - Houston
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1:53 AM Ishan
>>>>>> Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Hi,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> There was a performance regression
>>>>>> identified in 8.6.0 release due to SOLR-12845. I think it is serious 
>>>>>> enough
>>>>>> to warrant an immediate bug fix release.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> I propose a 8.6.1 release. Unfortunately,
>>>>>> I'll be unable to volunteer for this release owning to some other
>>>>>> commitments, however Andrzej mentioned in Slack that he might be able to
>>>>>> volunteer for this post 27th.
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Are there any thoughts/concerns regarding
>>>>>> this?
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Regards,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >> Ishan
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > --
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Regards,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Atri
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Apache Concerted
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> --
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Regards,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Atri
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Apache Concerted
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>> dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>> dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Atri
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Concerted
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>> dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>> dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>> --
>>>>>> >>>>> http://www.needhamsoftware.com (work)
>>>>>> >>>>> http://www.the111shift.com (play)
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>> >>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Noble Paul
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Atri
>>>> Apache Concerted
>>>>
>>> --
Marcus Eagan

Reply via email to