We don't need Jersey either. It is already possible for Solr to accept
arbitrarily nested paths for endpoints (using annotations) without using
Restlet or Jersey.

On Wed, 23 Sep, 2020, 8:16 pm Alexandre Rafalovitch, <arafa...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> How much harder are the use-cases currently covered by managed
> resources, if that module was removed?
>
> For standalone instances, it is nearly as easy to edit the file and
> reload the schema. And it will probably be more version-control
> friendly than the files currently saved by the module.
> What about for SolrCloud?
>
> My feeling is that this module did not catch on, I don't think anybody
> ever implemented additional managed resources, though I remember
> seeing Jiras. So, unless there are super-special use cases, I am +1 on
> deprecating it ASAP for 8.7 and removing it in 9. It will fit with the
> overall theme of getting slimmer and more consistent.
>
> Regards,
>    Alex.
> P.s. Also, I think the question on SolrUsers about this had limited
> response and mentioned a security issue.
>
>
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 10:28, Timothy Potter <thelabd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I agree we should deprecate the managed resources feature, it was the
> first thing I was asked to build by LW nearly 7 years ago, before I was a
> committer. Restlet was already in place and I built on top of that, not
> sure who introduced it originally (nor do I care). Clearly from the vantage
> point of looking back, JAX-RS and Jersey won the day with REST in Java but
> that simply wasn't the case back then. What's important is how we move
> forward vs. bestowing judgement backed by wisdom of hindsight on decisions
> made many years ago.
> >
> > In the short term, does Apache have an Artifactory (or similar) where we
> can host the Restlet dependencies for Github to pull them from? If not,
> then we can port the code that's using Restlet over to using JAX-RS /
> Jersey. Personally I'd prefer we remove Managed Resources support from 9
> instead of porting the Restlet code but I don't know if 9 is too soon from
> a deprecation stand point?
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:33 PM Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> We should deprecate that feature and remove restlet dependency
> altogether
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:20 PM Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Restlet again!!!!!!!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Joel Bernstein
> >> > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 7:18 AM Eric Pugh <
> ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Do we have a community blessed alternative to restlet already?
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sep 20, 2020, at 9:40 AM, Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Haha.
> >> >>
> >> >> In fact schema APIs don't use restlet. Only the managed resources
> use it
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020, 3:35 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> If I were talend, I'd immediately start publishing to maven
> central. If I were the developer who built the schema APIs, I would never
> have used restlet to begin with.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Sat, 19 Sep, 2020, 1:13 am Uwe Schindler, <u...@thetaphi.de>
> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I was thinking the same. Because GitHub does not cache the
> downloaded artifacts like our jenkins servers.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> It seems to run it in a new VM or container every time, so it
> downloads all artifacts. If I were Talend, I'd also block this.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Uwe
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Am September 18, 2020 7:32:47 PM UTC schrieb Dawid Weiss <
> dawid.we...@gmail.com>:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I don't think it's http/https - I believe restlet repository
> simply
> >> >>>>> bans github servers because of excessive traffic? These URLs work
> for
> >> >>>>> me locally...
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Dawid
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 6:35 PM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> >> >>>>> LONDON) <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>  This sounds vaguely familiar. "http works, https does not work"
> and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13756 possibly related?
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>  From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 09/18/20 10:01:29
> >> >>>>>>  To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> >> >>>>>>  Subject: Re: restlet dependencies
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>  I don't think it is, sadly.
> >> >>>>>>  https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/restlet
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>  The link you provided (mvnrepository) aggregates from several
> maven
> >> >>>>>>  repositories.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>  D.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>  On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:46 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> >> >>>>>>  <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>  Sorry, afk, but I heard (*hearsay*) that restlet is also on
> maven central
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> these days. Can we confirm and switch to that? Sorry, if that's
> not the case.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>  On Fri, 18 Sep, 2020, 1:15 pm Dawid Weiss, <
> dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>  Just FYI: can't get PR builds on github to work recently
> because of this:
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Could not resolve all files for configuration
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> ':solr:core:compileClasspath'.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>  350 > Could not download org.restlet.ext.servlet-2.4.3.jar
> >> >>>>>>>>  (org.restlet.jee:org.restlet.ext.servlet:2.4.3)
> >> >>>>>>>>  351 > Could not get resource
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> '
> https://maven.restlet.com/org/restlet/jee/org.restlet.ext.servlet/2.4.3/org.res
> >> >>>>>> tlet.ext.servlet-2.4.3.jar'.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>  352 > Could not GET
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> '
> https://maven.restlet.com/org/restlet/jee/org.restlet.ext.servlet/2.4.3/org.res
> >> >>>>>> tlet.ext.servlet-2.4.3.jar'.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>  353 > Connection reset
> >> >>>>>>>>  354 > Could not download org.restlet-2.4.3.jar
> >> >>>>>>>>  (org.restlet.jee:org.restlet:2.4.3)
> >> >>>>>>>>  355 > Could not get resource
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> '
> https://maven.restlet.com/org/restlet/jee/org.restlet/2.4.3/org.restlet-2.4.3.j
> >> >>>>>> ar'.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>  356 > Could not GET
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> '
> https://maven.restlet.talend.com/org/restlet/jee/org.restlet/2.4.3/org.restlet-
> >> >>>>>> 2.4.3.jar'.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>  357 > Connection reset
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>  D.
> >> >>>>>>>> ________________________________
> >> >>>>>>>>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >> >>>>>>>>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> ________________________________
> >> >>>>>>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >> >>>>>>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>> ________________________________
> >> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>> Uwe Schindler
> >> >>>> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
> >> >>>> https://www.thetaphi.de
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________
> >> >> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC |
> 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com | My Free/Busy
> >> >> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed
> >> >> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered
> to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless
> of whether attachments are marked as such.
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> -----------------------------------------------------
> >> Noble Paul
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to