Ishan, why would this be a blocker for 8.7? Would it be good enough to remove in branch_8x?
Le ven. 30 oct. 2020 à 18:33, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> a écrit : > +1 to removing it (in 8.7 with a respin, if needed). If we can't support > it, there's no need to keep it. If someone wants, they can assume ownership > of a third party package. +1 to removing all non essential code and > trimming down the Solr distribution. There's no good reason for Solr, which > is in effect just a distributed layer on top of Lucene, to be a 200MB > download. > > On Fri, 30 Oct, 2020, 9:50 pm Uwe Schindler, <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > >> I fully agree with Erick, >> >> Please don't start and try to get 8.x on Java 11. Release Lucene/Solr 9! >> >> Uwe >> >> ----- >> Uwe Schindler >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen >> https://www.thetaphi.de >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> >> > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 3:39 PM >> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: Solr 8.x and contribs requiring Java 11 >> > >> > I’m always reluctant to change something like this for a point release. >> > >> > I’ve been supposing that we’d release Solr 9 for a while, I always >> thought >> > that moving to Java 11 would be a driver for the 9.0 release but I >> wasn’t >> > correct in that. >> > >> > That expectation has been complicated by the whole reference impl thing. >> > >> > What I’d suggest is that we push forward with a 9.0 release and consider >> > it something of a placeholder while the reference impl either becomes >> > our main line or doesn’t. Then your problem disappears ;). >> Unfortunately, >> > a new major release always takes some time. >> > >> > FWIW, >> > Erick >> > >> > > On Oct 30, 2020, at 10:30 AM, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > I've run into this in SOLR-14974. The dependency is on Java 11. >> > > Everything works if you build and run under Java 11 but of course it >> > > won't fly on Java 8 (won't even compile). >> > > >> > > I wonder what are your thoughts on keeping Java 8 as the minimum for >> > > Solr 8x. Is 8.x going to be on Java 8 forever? Or is minimum of Java >> > > 11 a possibility, only nobody got to it yet? >> > > >> > > Dawid >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >>
