Is there an ASF GA account we could use?

On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 12:06 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:

> You are right, we still use the Lucene GA code in there, which noone knows
> anything about.
> I should probably switch GA code on Solr side to a new GA account?
>
> Jan
>
> > 2. mar. 2021 kl. 23:14 skrev Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Did we get to any consensus on Google Analytics (or other) tracking?
> > Would have been nice to track the moment of split.
> >
> > Regards,
> >   Alex.
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 16:44, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> We fixed JavaDoc and RefGuide on Solr side (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15177) and redirects on Lucene
> side (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15171) -- hopefully.
> >>
> >> The Lucene redirects can be tested right now, e.g.
> https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/solr/guide/8_8/ redirects to
> https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_8/ which currently does not exist but
> will once we publish.
> >>
> >> I plan to depoy the new Solr site tomorrow, Wednesday. And then
> afterwards the new Lucene site.
> >> After the deploy we can do rapid commits to fix whatever comes up.
> >>
> >> Feel free to continue to comment here, or simply commit fixes to the
> main/solr and main/lucene branches at
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-site
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 20:16 skrev Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de>:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Javadocs and refguide do not work in staging sites. They can only be
> seen on production servers. We can’t test those, but I am confident, Jan’s
> new htaccess rules will work (they point to the special subversion
> production repo, still shared by lucene/solr for the time being).
> >>
> >> Uwe
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Uwe Schindler
> >> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> >> https://www.thetaphi.de
> >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> >>
> >> From: Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:25 PM
> >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Review request - New Solr website
> >>
> >> Thanks for reviewing. Yes, the javadocs and refguide are not part of
> the site git repo, but will materialize through .htaccess rules once the
> site is published to the final location.
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>
> >> 2. mar. 2021 kl. 17:17 skrev Michael McCandless <
> luc...@mikemccandless.com>:
> >>
> >> Thank you Jan!  I clicked around a bit and it looks awesome, but I hit
> a broken link for the Solr javadocs "Latest Release" link on this page:
> https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/resources.html -- likely this is
> not an issue because
> >> once this is moved to the right location, that link should "just work"
> maybe?
> >>
> >> Mike McCandless
> >>
> >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:32 AM Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On the new "Project" page (
> https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/whoweare.html) I have attempted
> to make some kind of TLP landing page, framing "what" and "who we are".
> >>
> >> The path I have taken so far is, instead of duplicating a list of
> names, which will get out of date, instead link to official roster at
> https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?solr for the authoritative
> list of PMC and committers. It will steal away the opportunity for new
> committers to have something to commit at day 1, but I can live with that.
> >>
> >> The missing piece is the "Emeritus" list. So let me throw out some
> questions:
> >> * The ASF does not operate with emeritus PMC or committers. Do we need
> to?
> >> * If we want to stick to a notion of "emeritus" committers, what should
> the initial list of emeritus Solr committers be?
> >>
> >> Please also proof-read that entire page, it is brand new and English is
> not my 1st language.
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>> 1. mar. 2021 kl. 09:56 skrev Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com>:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have been working on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14499 to prepare the separate
> website for Solr.
> >>> I believe the work is practically done, and would like a broader
> review before I actually publish the changes.
> >>>
> >>> The staging site which will eventually be solr.apache.org is at
> https://lucene-solrtlp.staged.apache.org/
> >>> The staging site which shows the lucene site without Solr is at
> https://lucene-new.staged.apache.org/
> >>>
> >>> Any feedback is welcome, here or in the JIRA issue. I intend to
> publish the new sites in a couple of days.
> >>>
> >>> Jan
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>

-- 
Anshum Gupta

Reply via email to