> On LUCENE-10255, there's a reference to issues with the Luke Analysis > UI, is it something we can fix as well for RC3?
Rather than making the old UI work with the module system, I would remove it (at least for now). https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/475 Could I backport it to branch_9_0? Tomoko 2021年11月25日(木) 3:46 Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de>: > See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10260 > > > > ----- > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > *From:* Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 24, 2021 7:44 PM > *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org > *Subject:* RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2 > > > > I found another bug in Luke: > > > > Implementation version no longer shows. May have to do with this class > LuceneVersion no longer getting Implementation-Version from the module JAR. > > > > This is not serious, but would be good to fix in a respin. Will open issue. > > > > ----- > > Uwe Schindler > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 7:00 PM > > > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2 > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > although the smoke teste succeeded by Jenkins: > > > https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/6/console > > > > > > ...my manual review ran into problems: > > > - Luke did not start for me, see > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE- > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259> > > > 10259 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10259> (fix is > easy, just quotes missing in shell scripts). Because on Windows it > > > uses "javaw" and not "java", you don’t even see an error message which is > > > fatal! > > > > > > So -1 to release (sorry, we need a test with whitespace, e.g. > smoketester should > > > check this, but starting luke is hard inside smoker). > > > > > > What looks fine: > > > - Javadocs are very nice the home page of docs folder looks fine > > > - Licenses are OK > > > - The three folders with JAR files are good, very easy to understand. > > > > > > Home dir is also good. > > > > > > I did not do a real project with Maven, because I have no pure-lucene one > > > available. I would need solr-9.0.0, too 😊 > > > > > > Uwe > > > > > > ----- > > > Uwe Schindler > > > Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen > > > https://www.thetaphi.de > > > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 9:40 AM > > > > To: Lucene Dev <dev@lucene.apache.org> > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC2 > > > > > > > > Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene 9.0.0 > > > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded from: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev- > > > > 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75 > > > > > > > > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > > > > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.0.0-RC2-rev- > > > > 95072f3b71e67e308d71a6149323bf7dd04c8f75 > > > > > > > > The vote will be open until 2021-11-26 09:00 UTC. > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > > > > > Here is my +1 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Adrien > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >
