> Adrien has agreed to take over as release manager in my absence

I just completed the post-release steps, so everything should be good
now. Please let me know if something looks odd.

On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 9:07 PM Julie Tibshirani <juliet...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone, I am headed out of town for a week without internet access. 
> Adrien has agreed to take over as release manager in my absence (thank you 
> Adrien!!) We are already past 72 hours and have a good number of votes, so 
> hopefully things will go smoothly this week.
>
> Julie
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 1:55 AM Mayya Sharipova 
> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Julie for summarizing the issues.
>> I've got SUCCESS on the second run:
>>
>> SUCCESS! [1:45:55.377066]
>>
>> So, +1 from me as well.
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 4:04 AM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I found a way to disable the log4shell patch on my work machine, and got a 
>>> pass:
>>>
>>> SUCCESS! [1:00:57.577806]
>>>
>>> I don't think we need to be concerned about trying to adapt to this
>>> thing. It only conflicts with the test framework, and devs can turn it
>>> off to run tests. Somehow our automated builds don't seem to be
>>> affected.
>>>
>>> so, +1 from me
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:38 PM Patrick Zhai <zhai7...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Julie, thanks for summarizing the issues, for 4, as far as I 
>>> > understand, there's nothing that needs to be changed on lucece's end. 
>>> > We're still having trouble running the smoke test on Amazon's machine, 
>>> > but I've tried it on my own machine and it passed.
>>> >
>>> > So here's my +1. SUCCESS! [0:59:35.291572]
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 2:26 PM Julie Tibshirani <juliet...@gmail.com> 
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi everyone, people have run into several test failures, here's a 
>>> >> summary to make it easier to follow:
>>> >>
>>> >> Some tests can be very slow with certain random parameters, and this can 
>>> >> cause the smoke tester to take several hours -- this seems like a 
>>> >> test-only problem, and we're working to address it in 
>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10473.
>>> >> TestMatchAllDocsQuery#testEarlyTermination can fail with assertion -- 
>>> >> this is a test-only issue, and has already been fixed in 
>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10472.
>>> >> TestIndexWriterMergePolicy#testStressUpdateSameDocumentWithMergeOnGetReader
>>> >>  can OOM -- this is a known issue and is not expected to occur outside 
>>> >> of tests (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10088)
>>> >> Security manager issues from Amazon's log4shell patch -- not sure this 
>>> >> requires a change on our end? It sounds like Mike is investigating the 
>>> >> issues now (thanks!)
>>> >> Test suite may also stall on some machines? -- Uwe mentioned "Looks like 
>>> >> a problem with the test or some wrong assumption or some missing 
>>> >> synchronized block (the Policeman Jenkins machine has many cores, so 
>>> >> issues with not synchronized cache lines can happen easily)." Is this a 
>>> >> different problem from #1 where we just have slow tests? I'm not sure if 
>>> >> this is something we want to investigate as part of the release or if we 
>>> >> think it can wait.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Julie
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 12:17 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> 
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> We had to do a workaround in our internal test suites by setting a
>>> >>> system property to trick this thing into not running; Maybe we can
>>> >>> apply that also here...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 3:12 PM Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> 
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > I think this is Amazon trying to cope with log4shell - they've added
>>> >>> > external instrumentation.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 7:51 PM Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > > >>   2>    at 
>>> >>> > > >> java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:521)
>>> >>> > > >>   2>    at Log4jHotPatch.asmVersion(Log4jHotPatch.java:71)
>>> >>> > > >>   2>    at Log4jHotPatch.agentmain(Log4jHotPatch.java:93)
>>> >>> > > >>   2>    ... 6 more
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > > > Does anyone have an idea?
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > > Your JVM is broken, look at this Log4jHotPatch stuff causing 
>>> >>> > > trouble.
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>> >
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>> >>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>


-- 
Adrien

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to