+1 (PMC) from me too! On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 8:47 AM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry I missed the first vote I think; also +1(pmc) from me. I'd be OK > with some issues (esp. closed ones) being orphaned in the old system > too. > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 9:20 AM Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I'm fine with either system (or both used concurrently). There is > significant research effort Tomoko did already and I support this effort: > +1 from me. > > > > Dawid > > > > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 5:40 PM Tomoko Uchida < > tomoko.uchida.1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi everyone! > >> > >> As we had previous discussion thread [1], I propose migration to GitHub > issue from Jira. > >> It'd be technically possible (see [2] for details) and I think it'd be > good for the project - not only for welcoming new developers who are not > familiar with Jira, but also for improving the experiences of long-term > committers/contributors by consolidating the conversation platform. > >> > >> You can see a short summary of the discussion, some stats on current > Jira issues, and a draft migration plan in [2]. > >> Please review [2] if you haven't seen it and vote for this proposal. > >> > >> The vote will be open until 2022-06-06 16:00 UTC. > >> > >> [ ] +1 approve > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> > >> Here is my +1 > >> > >> *IMPORTANT NOTE* > >> I set a local protocol for this vote. > >> There are 95 committers on this project [3] - the vote will be > effective if it successfully gains more than 15% of voters (>= 15) from > committers (including PMC members). This means, that although only PMC > member votes are counted for the final result, the votes from all > committers are important to make the vote result effective. > >> > >> If there are less than 15 votes at 2022-06-06 16:00 UTC, I will expand > the term to 2022-06-13 16:00 UTC. If this fails to get sufficient voters > after the expanded time limit, I'll cancel this vote regardless of the > result. > >> But why do I set such an extra bar? My fear is that if such things are > decided by the opinions of a few members, the result shouldn't yield a good > outcome for the future. It isn't my goal to just pass the vote [4]. > >> > >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/78wj0vll73sct065m5jjm4z8gqb5yffk > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557 > >> [3] https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?lucene > >> [4] I'm sorry for being overly cautious, but I have never met in person > or virtually any of the committers (with a very few exceptions), therefore > cannot assess if the vote result is reliable or not unless there is certain > explicit feedback. > >> > >> Tomoko > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
