+1 Approve (PMC)

I'm not worried about reliance on GitHub as it is already approved by ASF. This 
will lower the barrier to participation for new contributors.

- Jan

> 30. mai 2022 kl. 17:39 skrev Tomoko Uchida <[email protected]>:
> 
> Hi everyone!
> 
> As we had previous discussion thread [1], I propose migration to GitHub issue 
> from Jira.
> It'd be technically possible (see [2] for details) and I think it'd be good 
> for the project - not only for welcoming new developers who are not familiar 
> with Jira, but also for improving the experiences of long-term 
> committers/contributors by consolidating the conversation platform.
> 
> You can see a short summary of the discussion, some stats on current Jira 
> issues, and a draft migration plan in [2].
> Please review [2] if you haven't seen it and vote for this proposal.
> 
> The vote will be open until 2022-06-06 16:00 UTC.
> 
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> Here is my +1
> 
> *IMPORTANT NOTE*
> I set a local protocol for this vote.
> There are 95 committers on this project [3] - the vote will be effective if 
> it successfully gains more than 15% of voters (>= 15) from committers 
> (including PMC members). This means, that although only PMC member votes are 
> counted for the final result, the votes from all committers are important to 
> make the vote result effective.
> 
> If there are less than 15 votes at 2022-06-06 16:00 UTC, I will expand the 
> term to 2022-06-13 16:00 UTC. If this fails to get sufficient voters after 
> the expanded time limit, I'll cancel this vote regardless of the result.
> But why do I set such an extra bar? My fear is that if such things are 
> decided by the opinions of a few members, the result shouldn't yield a good 
> outcome for the future. It isn't my goal to just pass the vote [4].
> 
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/78wj0vll73sct065m5jjm4z8gqb5yffk 
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/78wj0vll73sct065m5jjm4z8gqb5yffk>
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10557>
> [3] https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?lucene 
> <https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?lucene>
> [4] I'm sorry for being overly cautious, but I have never met in person or 
> virtually any of the committers (with a very few exceptions), therefore 
> cannot assess if the vote result is reliable or not unless there is certain 
> explicit feedback.
> 
> Tomoko

Reply via email to