OK, this is clearly messed up, but just for my education, I'd like to
understand the possible failure scenario. Oh thanks Adrien, just saw
your latest. So that confirms what I was thinking: that this is not
likely to cause problems in any foreseeable scenario; there is no
backwards-incompatibility; your index or usage of it would have to be
corrupted in some way for this to be a problem, and this is a problem
about precise error reporting in such a case. I guess it's a nice
feature that we can notice this specific  form of index corruption
(you somehow got a single file from an old index mixed in with files
*for the same segment* from a new index).

I will re-spin today. I don't think we should wait any longer for
AdoptOpenJDK - sorry Uwe; I too would like to be able to mess around
with the new features in JDK19, but I think it's not a good precedent
to tie our release schedule to an external project's.

On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 5:42 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ignacio made me notice than the new Lucene94FieldInfosFormat did not change 
> the codec name compared to Lucene90FieldInfosFormat: 
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/blob/branch_9_4/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene94/Lucene94FieldInfosFormat.java#L376.
>
> The issue with this is that if you mistakenly open a Lucene90FieldInfos file 
> with the 9.4 codec, then it will tell you that there is a corruption despite 
> the fact that checksums match, instead of pointing out the codec mismatch.
>
> I suggest that we respin to address this problem.
>
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 8:24 PM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> The smoke tests passed.
>> SUCCESS! [2:49:17.242508]
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:22 PM Patrick Zhai <zhai7...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> (non-binding) +1
>>>
>>> SUCCESS! [1:11:00.934249]
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 9:44 AM Vigya Sharma <vigya.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The smoke tests passed for me too..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (no vote)
>>>>
>>>> SUCCESS! [1:12:31.588303]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 2:27 AM Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:46:00.508949]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 9:53 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:35.275017]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 9:19 PM Michael McCandless 
>>>>>> <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:27:16.514391]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike McCandless
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 2:32 PM Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1.
>>>>>>>> SUCCESS! [0:53:33.891603]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ran the smoketester with both java 11 and 17:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> SUCCESS! [2:41:19.024193]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 10:10 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene 9.4.0
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>>>>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.0-RC1-rev-f5d0646daa5651f2192282ac85551bca667e34f9
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
>>>>>>>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-9.4.0-RC1-rev-f5d0646daa5651f2192282ac85551bca667e34f9
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until 2022-09-24 
>>>>>>>>> > 02:00 UTC.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > [ ] +1  approve
>>>>>>>>> > [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>>>>>>> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > Here is my +1
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Adrien
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> - Vigya
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anshum Gupta
>
>
>
> --
> Adrien

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to