Hi all,

We merged the PR for adding stale labels and ran the bot a few minutes ago.
The run [1] went through 133 PRs, starting from the most recently created
and found 91 stale [2].
The workflow will continue running daily. By tomorrow, it should get
through all the PRs.

[1] https://github.com/apache/lucene/actions/runs/7447339092/job/20259452054
[2]
https://github.com/apache/lucene/pulls?q=is%3Apr+label%3AStale+is%3Aclosed

On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 at 15:47, Stefan Vodita <stefan.vod...@gmail.com> wrote:

> There's a flag for excluding draft PRs [1]. I'll add it to the workflow.
> If we need more flexibility in the future, we can also exclude PRs with
> certain labels [2].
>
> Stefan
>
> [1] https://github.com/actions/stale?tab=readme-ov-file#exempt-draft-pr
> [2] https://github.com/actions/stale?tab=readme-ov-file#exempt-pr-labels
>
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 at 15:30, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> would it be possible to exclude DRAFT pull requests from this check? I
>> can't send a weekly reminder to my own WIP PRs, like the MMapDirectory one
>> (because it waits for Java 22 to be in RC phase).
>>
>> Uwe
>> Am 04.01.2024 um 14:04 schrieb Michael McCandless:
>>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> Stefan Vodita made an awesome simple PR adding a GitHub action to remind
>> / nag us about stale PRs: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12813
>>
>> This happened after an in-person discussion at the last Community Over
>> Code NA in Halifax where Stefan learned about the nice automation Apache
>> Beam uses to nudge PRs forward.  This change is just a baby step to try to
>> get our stale PRs into a healthier state / workflow.
>>
>> In the ultimate irony, that PR itself had become stale recently (2 weeks
>> of no activity) -- a "meta-stale PR"!
>>
>> I would like to merge this PR soon, but:
>>     * It will generate a bunch of one-time noise because we have ~163
>> open PRs many of which are stale:
>> https://githubsearch.mikemccandless.com/search.py?dd=status%3AOpen&dd=issue_or_pr%3APR
>>     * I know nothing about GitHub actions YAML format, but worst comes to
>> worst we push it, it fails in some exotic way, and we revert.
>>
>> I assume lazy consensus soon ;)
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>> --
>> Uwe Schindler
>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremenhttps://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>
>>

Reply via email to