I expect that the entry will be added in 9.12 except in the 9_11 branch where it should be in 9.11.1. I will synchronize the CHANGES.txt once I am done with the release.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 4:49 PM Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you. I've applied 13315 to main, branch_9x and branch_9_11. Can't > remember what changes.txt policy is - do we copy the entire section for > 9.11 once it's cut back to main/ 9x? > > Dawid > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 4:41 PM Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Stefan sounds good. >> >> Sure Dawid. Thanks for moving it forward. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ignacio >> >> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 4:38 PM Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> I would like to backport this change to unified highlighter to 9.11.1, >>> if there are no objections. >>> https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13315 >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 9:37 AM Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I am now preparing for a bugfix release from branch branch_9_11. I am >>>> planning to build the RC next Monday. >>>> >>>> Please observe the normal rules for committing to this branch: >>>> >>>> * Before committing to the branch, reply to this thread and argue >>>> why the fix needs backporting and how long it will take. >>>> * All issues accepted for backporting should be marked with 9.11.1 >>>> in GitHub, and issues that should delay the release must be marked as >>>> Blocker >>>> * All patches that are intended for the branch should first be committed >>>> to the unstable branch, merged into the stable branch, and then into >>>> the current release branch. >>>> * Only issues with Milestone version 9.11.1 and priority "Blocker" will >>>> delay >>>> a release candidate build. >>>> >>>> There are already three fixes backported to branch 9.11: >>>> >>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13498 >>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13504 >>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/13501 >>>> >>>> @Stefan you mention in another thread an issue with >>>> StringValueFacetCounts but I see there is no fix for it yet, what's the >>>> status there? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Ignacio >>>> >>>
