Hello,
I have been trying to build the artifacts but I am unable to sing
them. I have done this before so it used to work for me so I am not
sure if something has changed on my setup or something has changed on
the build.
It fails when running the following command:
./gradlew --stacktrace --no-daemon assembleRelease
-Dversion.release=10.2.0 -Psign --max-workers 2
-Psigning.keyId="7CF99ADC"
The error is very vague:
Caused by: org.gradle.api.InvalidUserDataException: Cannot perform
signing task ':lucene:backward-codecs:signSignedJarsPublication'
because it has no configured signatory
at org.gradle.plugins.signing.Sign.generate(Sign.java:230)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103)
at org.gradle.internal.reflect.JavaMethod.invoke(JavaMethod.java:125)
I wonder if someone has any idea about this.
Thanks in advance!
On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 8:37 PM Benjamin Trent <ben.w.tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have merged and backported the connected components logic for the 10.2.0
> release.
>
> Thanks y'all!
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 8:50 AM Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I agree that the downsides are much bigger than the benefits. I have
>> no strong opinion between reverting the change or disabling it, maybe
>> for 10.2 is safer to just disable it.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 2:28 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > It makes sense to me. I think it's providing marginal benefits, and the
>> > downside is bad
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2025, 4:58 AM Benjamin Trent <ben.w.tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hey y'all,
>> >>
>> >> Unless there is strong dissenting opinion, I think we should revert the
>> >> connected components work in HNSW for 10.2 as a bug
>> >> fix.https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14411
>> >>
>> >> We found that when "connectedComponents" is most needed (e.g. a very
>> >> disconnected graph), it takes an inordinate amount of compute and can
>> >> significantly stall indexing and merging. This is for vector
>> >> distributions that are likely not well supported for HNSW anyways.
>> >>
>> >> The discussion here indicates that reversion (or disabling), is the way
>> >> to go: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14214
>> >>
>> >> Here is my PR for disabling: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14436
>> >>
>> >> I am not doing a full revert as the original changes adjusted the APIs in
>> >> v10 (adding exception declaration, etc.).
>> >>
>> >> Let me know what y'all think,
>> >>
>> >> Ben
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 5:59 PM Mayya Sharipova
>> >> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hello everyone,
>> >>> We have discovered that a change introduced in 10.2 doesn't work nicely
>> >>> when two fields are indexed with the same analyzer. There is a
>> >>> workaround, but for now I will revert this change for the 10.2 release
>> >>> to further investigation.
>> >>>
>> >>> Sorry for the trouble.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 4:37 AM Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hey Tommaso,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I have no objections if you can get the PR merged today.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Ignacio
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:14 PM Tommaso Teofili
>> >>>> <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > I'd like to get https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14094 in by
>> >>>> > tomorrow, unless anyone objects.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 at 17:15, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> i added some bullets for automaton/regex improvements.
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 9:47 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> > I would like to highlight the performance improvements that are
>> >>>> >> > coming in 10.2 in a way that sounds a bit more exciting that our
>> >>>> >> > usual bullet points so I started working on the release notes:
>> >>>> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Releases+Notes+10.2.0
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 1:37 PM Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> > wrote:
>> >>>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >> Thanks Rob for the heads up. Let's try to improve those scripts
>> >>>> >> >> for posterity.
>> >>>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 5:50 PM Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> >> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >> >
>> >>>> >> >> > +1 and I am happy to assist RM with the python scripts situation
>> >>>> >> >> > (release wizard / smoke tester)
>> >>>> >> >> >
>> >>>> >> >> > I am 100% sure I caused some breakage in the scripts by
>> >>>> >> >> > introducing
>> >>>> >> >> > the linting and type-checking/hints. But I am convinced if we
>> >>>> >> >> > work
>> >>>> >> >> > through the problems (one-time pain), it will make it easier to
>> >>>> >> >> > maintain these scripts down the road.
>> >>>> >> >> >
>> >>>> >> >> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:35 PM Adrien Grand
>> >>>> >> >> > <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> >> >> > >
>> >>>> >> >> > > +1 let's get these huge performance improvements out
>> >>>> >> >> > >
>> >>>> >> >> > > Thank you Ignacio
>> >>>> >> >> > >
>> >>>> >> >> > >
>> >>>> >> >> > > Le mar. 25 mars 2025, 17:18, Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> >> >> > > a écrit :
>> >>>> >> >> > >>
>> >>>> >> >> > >> Hi,
>> >>>> >> >> > >>
>> >>>> >> >> > >> Lucene 10.1.0 was released 3 months ago and improvements are
>> >>>> >> >> > >> piling up
>> >>>> >> >> > >> so I would like to propose a lucene 10.2.0 release. I am
>> >>>> >> >> > >> proposing to
>> >>>> >> >> > >> cut the branch on Monday next week and build the RC by the
>> >>>> >> >> > >> end of the
>> >>>> >> >> > >> week.
>> >>>> >> >> > >>
>> >>>> >> >> > >> I am happy to be the release manager for 10.2.0 unless
>> >>>> >> >> > >> anyone else
>> >>>> >> >> > >> wants to do it.
>> >>>> >> >> > >>
>> >>>> >> >> > >> Thanks,
>> >>>> >> >> > >>
>> >>>> >> >> > >> Ignacio
>> >>>> >> >> > >>
>> >>>> >> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> >> >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>> >> >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>> >> >> > >>
>> >>>> >> >> >
>> >>>> >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>> >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>> >> >> >
>> >>>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>> >> >>
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> >
>> >>>> >> > --
>> >>>> >> > Adrien
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
