If I change the command to : ./gradlew --stacktrace --no-daemon assembleRelease -Dversion.release=10.2.0 -Psign --max-workers 2 -PuseGpg -Psigning.gnupg.keyName="XXXX"
Then it works. I just follow the instructions in "gradlew helpPublishing". Why this needs to change now, it is a mystery to me. On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 2:24 PM Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have been trying to build the artifacts but I am unable to sing > them. I have done this before so it used to work for me so I am not > sure if something has changed on my setup or something has changed on > the build. > > It fails when running the following command: > > ./gradlew --stacktrace --no-daemon assembleRelease > -Dversion.release=10.2.0 -Psign --max-workers 2 > -Psigning.keyId="7CF99ADC" > > The error is very vague: > > Caused by: org.gradle.api.InvalidUserDataException: Cannot perform > signing task ':lucene:backward-codecs:signSignedJarsPublication' > because it has no configured signatory > at org.gradle.plugins.signing.Sign.generate(Sign.java:230) > at > java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:103) > at org.gradle.internal.reflect.JavaMethod.invoke(JavaMethod.java:125) > > I wonder if someone has any idea about this. > > Thanks in advance! > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 8:37 PM Benjamin Trent <ben.w.tr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have merged and backported the connected components logic for the 10.2.0 > > release. > > > > Thanks y'all! > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 8:50 AM Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> I agree that the downsides are much bigger than the benefits. I have > >> no strong opinion between reverting the change or disabling it, maybe > >> for 10.2 is safer to just disable it. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 2:28 PM Michael Sokolov <msoko...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > It makes sense to me. I think it's providing marginal benefits, and the > >> > downside is bad > >> > > >> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2025, 4:58 AM Benjamin Trent <ben.w.tr...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hey y'all, > >> >> > >> >> Unless there is strong dissenting opinion, I think we should revert the > >> >> connected components work in HNSW for 10.2 as a bug > >> >> fix.https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14411 > >> >> > >> >> We found that when "connectedComponents" is most needed (e.g. a very > >> >> disconnected graph), it takes an inordinate amount of compute and can > >> >> significantly stall indexing and merging. This is for vector > >> >> distributions that are likely not well supported for HNSW anyways. > >> >> > >> >> The discussion here indicates that reversion (or disabling), is the way > >> >> to go: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/14214 > >> >> > >> >> Here is my PR for disabling: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14436 > >> >> > >> >> I am not doing a full revert as the original changes adjusted the APIs > >> >> in v10 (adding exception declaration, etc.). > >> >> > >> >> Let me know what y'all think, > >> >> > >> >> Ben > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 5:59 PM Mayya Sharipova > >> >> <mayya.sharip...@elastic.co.invalid> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Hello everyone, > >> >>> We have discovered that a change introduced in 10.2 doesn't work > >> >>> nicely when two fields are indexed with the same analyzer. There is a > >> >>> workaround, but for now I will revert this change for the 10.2 release > >> >>> to further investigation. > >> >>> > >> >>> Sorry for the trouble. > >> >>> > >> >>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 4:37 AM Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Hey Tommaso, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I have no objections if you can get the PR merged today. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Cheers, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Ignacio > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:14 PM Tommaso Teofili > >> >>>> <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > I'd like to get https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14094 in by > >> >>>> > tomorrow, unless anyone objects. > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> > On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 at 17:15, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> i added some bullets for automaton/regex improvements. > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 9:47 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> > >> >>>> >> wrote: > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > I would like to highlight the performance improvements that are > >> >>>> >> > coming in 10.2 in a way that sounds a bit more exciting that our > >> >>>> >> > usual bullet points so I started working on the release notes: > >> >>>> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Releases+Notes+10.2.0 > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 1:37 PM Ignacio Vera <iver...@gmail.com> > >> >>>> >> > wrote: > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> Thanks Rob for the heads up. Let's try to improve those scripts > >> >>>> >> >> for posterity. > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 5:50 PM Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> > >> >>>> >> >> wrote: > >> >>>> >> >> > > >> >>>> >> >> > +1 and I am happy to assist RM with the python scripts > >> >>>> >> >> > situation > >> >>>> >> >> > (release wizard / smoke tester) > >> >>>> >> >> > > >> >>>> >> >> > I am 100% sure I caused some breakage in the scripts by > >> >>>> >> >> > introducing > >> >>>> >> >> > the linting and type-checking/hints. But I am convinced if we > >> >>>> >> >> > work > >> >>>> >> >> > through the problems (one-time pain), it will make it easier > >> >>>> >> >> > to > >> >>>> >> >> > maintain these scripts down the road. > >> >>>> >> >> > > >> >>>> >> >> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 12:35 PM Adrien Grand > >> >>>> >> >> > <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>>> >> >> > > > >> >>>> >> >> > > +1 let's get these huge performance improvements out > >> >>>> >> >> > > > >> >>>> >> >> > > Thank you Ignacio > >> >>>> >> >> > > > >> >>>> >> >> > > > >> >>>> >> >> > > Le mar. 25 mars 2025, 17:18, Ignacio Vera > >> >>>> >> >> > > <iver...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> >>>> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> Hi, > >> >>>> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> Lucene 10.1.0 was released 3 months ago and improvements > >> >>>> >> >> > >> are piling up > >> >>>> >> >> > >> so I would like to propose a lucene 10.2.0 release. I am > >> >>>> >> >> > >> proposing to > >> >>>> >> >> > >> cut the branch on Monday next week and build the RC by the > >> >>>> >> >> > >> end of the > >> >>>> >> >> > >> week. > >> >>>> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> I am happy to be the release manager for 10.2.0 unless > >> >>>> >> >> > >> anyone else > >> >>>> >> >> > >> wants to do it. > >> >>>> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> Thanks, > >> >>>> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> Ignacio > >> >>>> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >>>> >> >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> >>>> >> >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> >>>> >> >> > >> > >> >>>> >> >> > > >> >>>> >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >>>> >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> >>>> >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> >>>> >> >> > > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >>>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> >>>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> >>>> >> >> > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > > >> >>>> >> > -- > >> >>>> >> > Adrien > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> >>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> >>>> >> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> >>>> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
