Oh, good point - there are a bunch of issues there! (in 10.6.0
milestone). I guess we should go through those as well to determine
which will be in scope.  Eventually we'll have to just set a deadline,
but maybe there are some there we can deprioritize?

On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 2:40 PM Kaival Parikh <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for starting this thread!
>
> I was interested in some vector search features coming out in Lucene 11, and 
> was also curious about the release process (old thread for Lucene 11: 
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c8sjqg0t79zzo06j6wj3pvhdlg5wph34)
>
> I'm also happy to contribute to the release process in any way I can!
>
> Q: if Lucene 11 is the next release, should we also consider things in 
> milestone 10.6.0 (https://github.com/apache/lucene/milestone/37)?
>
> On 2026-09-28 21:15 UTC Michael Sokolov via dev wrote:
> > I'd like to restart the release thread. Kaival, I think you had volunteered 
> > to be a RM? But we need to figure out what to include. Things are moving 
> > pretty fast at the moment, it seems to me from the mailing list anyway. But 
> > it's a little hard to see which issues are close and should be included. 
> > There are 32 open PR's tagged with milestone=11.0; however all but two are 
> > marked "Stale". I think we should ignore the Stale ones by default. Of the 
> > two other ones: one is https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16034, which 
> > really should be marked Stale since nobody has commented since May (and it 
> > makes me doubt the Stale tagging, actually). So this list may not indicate 
> > the issues folks truly want to get target for 11.0.
> >
> > I want to suggest that we go through and "untag" all the issues marked with 
> > 11.0 and have a period of a couple of days where committers can tag issues 
> > they want to see included. Other contributors should please refrain, but 
> > feel free to start a discussion on the mailing list if there is an open 
> > issue under active development that you feel is worth holding a release up 
> > for. If that makes sense, I can do the untagging.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to