I'm happy to drive a 10.6 release while 11.0 gets prepared. - Houston
On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 12:24 PM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> wrote: > That's fair - maybe we can have two people work in parallel on the two > releases?? > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 3:19 PM Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The 10.6.0 features already look quite big: its got new incremental > > update facilities and all kinds of stuff. I really don't want to > > derail or delay 11.0 as I think we should get it out too! But maybe we > > could get out a 10.6 in a shorter time while we tidy up for 11.0? > > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 2:52 PM Michael Sokolov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Oh, good point - there are a bunch of issues there! (in 10.6.0 > > > milestone). I guess we should go through those as well to determine > > > which will be in scope. Eventually we'll have to just set a deadline, > > > but maybe there are some there we can deprioritize? > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 2:40 PM Kaival Parikh <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks for starting this thread! > > > > > > > > I was interested in some vector search features coming out in Lucene > 11, and was also curious about the release process (old thread for Lucene > 11: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c8sjqg0t79zzo06j6wj3pvhdlg5wph34) > > > > > > > > I'm also happy to contribute to the release process in any way I can! > > > > > > > > Q: if Lucene 11 is the next release, should we also consider things > in milestone 10.6.0 (https://github.com/apache/lucene/milestone/37)? > > > > > > > > On 2026-09-28 21:15 UTC Michael Sokolov via dev wrote: > > > > > I'd like to restart the release thread. Kaival, I think you had > volunteered to be a RM? But we need to figure out what to include. Things > are moving pretty fast at the moment, it seems to me from the mailing list > anyway. But it's a little hard to see which issues are close and should be > included. There are 32 open PR's tagged with milestone=11.0; however all > but two are marked "Stale". I think we should ignore the Stale ones by > default. Of the two other ones: one is > https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/16034, which really should be > marked Stale since nobody has commented since May (and it makes me doubt > the Stale tagging, actually). So this list may not indicate the issues > folks truly want to get target for 11.0. > > > > > > > > > > I want to suggest that we go through and "untag" all the issues > marked with 11.0 and have a period of a couple of days where committers can > tag issues they want to see included. Other contributors should please > refrain, but feel free to start a discussion on the mailing list if there > is an open issue under active development that you feel is worth holding a > release up for. If that makes sense, I can do the untagging. > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
