[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13133746#comment-13133746
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-3509:
-----------------------------------------------
For naming consistency that would be better, but this option is only for DV of
type sorted bytes (BYTES_VAR_SORTED and BYTES_FIXED_SORTED).
So maybe something like "sortedBytesDocValuesFasterButMoreRam". I know it is a
long name but it describes when the option is applicable. Or maybe just
"docValuesFasterButMoreRam" but then the jdoc should clearly state that is only
applicable for sorted bytes DV.
> Add settings to IWC to optimize IDV indices for CPU or RAM respectivly
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3509
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3509
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/index
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Simon Willnauer
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-3509.patch
>
>
> spinnoff from LUCENE-3496 - we are seeing much better performance if required
> bits for PackedInts are rounded up to a 8/16/32/64. We should add this option
> to IWC and default to round up ie. more RAM & faster lookups.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
