[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13133747#comment-13133747 ]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3509: ------------------------------------- well one thing that confuses me about the long name is, should it be in IndexWriterConfig at all? The reason I say this, it seems to be very specific to a certain implementation of DV. For example, this (expert) option doesnt make much sense if I make my own implementation of sortedbytes (maybe for SimpleText :P), that doesnt use packed integers. > Add settings to IWC to optimize IDV indices for CPU or RAM respectivly > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-3509 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3509 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core/index > Affects Versions: 4.0 > Reporter: Simon Willnauer > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-3509.patch > > > spinnoff from LUCENE-3496 - we are seeing much better performance if required > bits for PackedInts are rounded up to a 8/16/32/64. We should add this option > to IWC and default to round up ie. more RAM & faster lookups. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org