This jar-src error is known to me, there is missing a dependency that creates build.dir J I never managed to fix it, but have seen it quite often. We should ignore that for now.
----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen <http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [email protected] From: Shai Erera [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 1:35 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 3.5.0, RC2 I ran my usual tests for RC2 and all pass, so +1 to release. As for what's been said in this thread, I personally don't think that javadoc errors such as reported should hold a release. But I think that it will be good if we can define some criteria for accepting an RC. For example, we can decide that running "ant test", or "ant all" on the source release ends with "BUILD SUCCESSFUL". Or we can decide that only "ant test". "ant jar" and "ant jar-src" end with BUILD SUCCESSFUL. Or whatever, as long as it's clear to everyone what is a MUST for a release. Perhaps it's already there, I don't know. BTW, if I run "ant clean jar-src", I get a BUILD FAILED with this error: $ant jar-src Buildfile: build.xml init: jar-src: BUILD FAILED C:\Users\shaie\Desktop\lucene-3.5.0-RC2\src\common-build.xml:752: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\Users\shaie\Desktop\lucene-3.5.0-RC2\src\common-build.xml:434: The following error occurred while executing this line: C:\Users\shaie\Desktop\lucene-3.5.0-RC2\src\common-build.xml:377: Failed to write C:\Users\shaie\Desktop\lucene-3.5.0-RC2\src\build\MANIFEST.MF Total time: 1 second I actually received it with previous releases as well, and always forgot to fix it. If I manually create 'build', then it's fine. I don't think it warrants a re-spin, because there's an easy workaround, but that's another thing that we could decide whether it's critical or not for accepting an RC. Shai On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Chris Hostetter <[email protected]> wrote: > > So I'm ammending my vote of RC2 to a -1. > the link is already working again. So i guess RC2 fixed itself. -- lucidimagination.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
