[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13156953#comment-13156953
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3595:
---------------------------------------
Committed trunk revision: 1206033
Now backporting.
> Refactor FieldCacheRangeFilter.FieldCacheDocIdSet to be separate class and
> fix the dangerous matchDoc() throws AIOOBE requirement
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3595
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3595
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Uwe Schindler
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Attachments: LUCENE-3595-trunk.patch, LUCENE-3595-trunk.patch
>
>
> Followup from LUCENE-3593:
> The FieldCacheRangeFilter.FieldCacheDocIdSet class has a strange requirement
> on the abstract matchDoc(): It should throw AIOOBE if the docId is > maxDoc.
> This check should be done by caller as especially on trunk, e.g.
> FieldCacheTermsFilter does not seem to always throw this exception correctly
> (getOrd() is a method and no array in TermsIndex cache).
> Also in 3.x the Filter does not correctly respect deletions when a FieldCache
> based on a reopened reader is used.
> This issue will refactor this and fix the bugs and moves the docId check up
> to the iterator.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
