[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13166462#comment-13166462
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2920:
--------------------------------
David: thanks for the updated, reading the diff something wonky jumped out at
me though...
in SingleFragListBuilder & SimpleFragListBuilder the "params" are no longer
wrapped in defaults at all - is that intentional? was that dead code before?
.. or is that just a accidental deletion?
> Refactor frequent conditional use of DefaultSolrParams into
> SolrParams.combine(p,d)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2920
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2920
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-2920_SolrParams_combine().patch,
> SOLR-2920_SolrParams_wrapDefaults_and_wrapAppended.patch
>
>
> I had a small bug in use of DefaultSolrParams in my code because I didn't
> check for non-existent defaults. I noticed through the Solr codebase that is
> code pattern is very common:
> {code:java}
> if( defaults != null ) {
> params = new DefaultSolrParams( params, defaults );
> }
> {code}
> Instead, I refactored this logic into a new SolrParams.combine(p,d) method
> and made it so that nobody refers to DefaultSolrParams. I did similarly for
> AppendedSolrParams.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
