[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13224774#comment-13224774
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-3778:
-----------------------------------------------
{quote}
So, yeah, I think default to Sort.RELEVANCE is good? Maybe we have 1
search method doing that and another taking the GroupSort?
I think it's strange to have a default for the top N groups (10)? I
think app should have to specify that as an arg to search...
{quote}
Makes sense.
bq. I think GroupingSearch (current name) is OK?
In the join module we have the JoinUtil. Maybe rename it to GroupUtil? Just to
be consistent? Or rename JoinUtil to JoinSearch?
> Create a grouping convenience class
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3778
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3778
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: modules/grouping
> Reporter: Martijn van Groningen
> Attachments: LUCENE-3778.patch, LUCENE-3778.patch
>
>
> Currently the grouping module has many collector classes with a lot of
> different options per class. I think it would be a good idea to have a
> GroupUtil (Or another name?) convenience class. I think this could be a
> builder, because of the many options
> (sort,sortWithinGroup,groupOffset,groupCount and more) and implementations
> (term/dv/function) grouping has.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
