I agree. I would have build only the javadocs with java 7, the rest with Java 5.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 1:36 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: VOTE: Lucene/Solr 3.6 > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > > > - Binary Javadocs still Geocities-like, it's no problem, but was it not > > planned to > use Java 7? - It's of course fine! > > > > Right: as i proposed originally on the list, this would be something special I > would do for the website *only*. > > In my opinion its too risky to do this in the build we ship, because it would > mean > i would have to compile with java7 and java5 bootstrap > classpath: of course in theory that shoudl all work, but i feel much more > comfortable building the release with an actual java 5 compiler. > > -- > lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional > commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
