> But I agree with Uwe - package absence looks bad. Again -- play with these attributes to find what you like.
> Maybe a compression scheme like people use would work here? E.g. > o.a.l.whatever.Class, or maybe even oal.whatever.Class ? I don't particularly like such compressions, they're misleading (some obfuscators do emit o.a.l.... :). > Also, does Java have access to the column width of the running terminal? If > so, the output width would not have to have a fixed width. I wish it had, but unfortunately the answer is no. This would make several things easier... Dawid --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
