[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13463038#comment-13463038 ]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-4426: -------------------------------------- bq. How does this relate to NumericIndexDocValueSource? I didn't know about this class! Maybe the new classes of my patch could replace this one: * the objectVal method returns an object whose type matches the ValueSource name, * there is the StrDocValuesFieldSource to deal with DocValues.Type.BYTES* when they are UTF8-encoded Strings * they use a default source when the segment has no DocValues * they give the ability to load direct sources (My goal is to reuse them in SOLR-3855) bq. I am confused why the current one only handles 3 types? Right. Strange that it is able to deal with VAR_INTS but none of FIXED_INTS_*. > New ValueSource implementations that wrap DocValues > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-4426 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4426 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: modules/other > Reporter: Adrien Grand > Assignee: Adrien Grand > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.1, 5.0 > > Attachments: LUCENE-4426.patch > > > We should have ValueSource implementations that wrap DocValues in > lucene-queries so that DocValues can be used in function queries. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org