I'll try to make a version of the test that is unrandomized -- I'll index the exact shapes needed and query for the specific shape using the right algorithm. And at that point, I'll try and reduce it. Simon's right; I'm looking for debugging tips/strategy advise. I find it pretty odd that my test will fail for a particular directory but not others (in the right circumstances -- i.e. the specific shapes etc.). That is suspicious -- it has me wondering if the bug is perhaps not in my code after all since I don't know what my code (or anyone's Lucene code for that matter) could possibly be doing that would make the outcome dependent on the directory implementation.
~ David ----- Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Possible-problem-with-RAMDirectory-tips-please-tp4054241p4054250.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
