[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13624476#comment-13624476
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4858:
------------------------------------
bq. collector constructor visiblity
Good catch, thanks!
bq. I'd like to discuss whether we should actually add the name of the Sorter
class in the "sorter" property of the diagnostics
+1, let's remove it and rely solely on Sorter.getID(). Besides class
refactoring, it's kinda odd that we don't trust the Sorter ID, and add the
class name. Rather, Numeric should return ID {{"numericdv_" + fieldName}}. And
REVERSE {{reverse_docs}}. And we should also clarify this in getID() javadocs.
What do you think?
> Early termination with SortingMergePolicy
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4858
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4858
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Assignee: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.3
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-4858.patch, LUCENE-4858.patch, LUCENE-4858.patch,
> LUCENE-4858.patch, LUCENE-4858.patch
>
>
> Spin-off of LUCENE-4752, see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4752?focusedCommentId=13606565&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13606565
> and
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4752?focusedCommentId=13607282&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13607282
> When an index is sorted per-segment, queries that sort according to the index
> sort order could be early terminated.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
