[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13690586#comment-13690586
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4943:
-----------------------------------
bq. Can we remove the constructors that don't take CoreContainer objects?
No, this issue doesn't move them, so they are all available under a single core
as well - I think if we want to deprecate/remove those, it can be another issue
- I don't have an issue with still offering them though - especially through
4X, but even in 5X is fine by me.
bq. Particularly for the InfoHandler,
Yeah, that's just copy past from the CoreAdminHandler - I'd have to look at why
it has both constructors, but it seems likely we can just remove it from the
InfoHandler.
> Add a new info admin handler.
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-4943
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4943
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Assignee: Mark Miller
> Fix For: 5.0, 4.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-4943-2.patch, SOLR-4943-3.patch, SOLR-4943.patch
>
>
> Currently, you have to specify a core to get system information for a variety
> of request handlers - properties, logging, thread dump, system, etc.
> These should be available at a system location and not core specific location.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
