bq: I think we should just get rid of it entirely +1, especially since we're going to core discovery, the collections API, etc.
FWIW, Erick On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Shawn Heisey <s...@elyograg.org> wrote: > On 8/27/2013 11:24 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote: > >> I just happened to notice that the solr.xml file in the Solr >> example/multicore in branch_4x (and 4.4 as well) is still in the old >> legacy format (with <cores>/<core>). Is that merely an oversight or >> intentional for demonstrating backwards compatibility? >> > > The example/multicore directory seems to generally very out of date. The > schema uses an ancient version, and doesn't have any good examples of how > to use analyzers effectively. I'm fairly sure that all the examples use > solr.xml and are therefore inherently multicore. > > Unless we plan to thoroughly update the multicore example so it's as > modern as the main example, I think we should just get rid of it entirely. > > If we need an example that uses legacy config methods, I think we should > make a new subdirectory. It should come with an extensive README and the > solrconfig/schema should be more heavily commented than the standard > example. > > Thanks, > Shawn > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.**org<dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
