[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13811310#comment-13811310
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5296:
--------------------------------------------
bq. Now that we have this codec, does it make sense to keep FacetDVF? As far as
I can tell, the only difference is that FacetDVF keeps the addresses as
PackedInts while DirectDVF as int[]?
Hmm that's a good question. I'll test the two...
> Add DirectDocValuesFormat
> -------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5296
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5296
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 4.6, 5.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-5296.patch
>
>
> Indexes values to disk but at search time it loads/accesses the values via
> simple java arrays (i.e. no compression).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
