+1 for committing it. Progress over perfection.

On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All:
>
> I'm a little overwhelmed by this thing. It's 500K and currently fails
> precommit with javadoc warnings. I can fix those bits with some
> boilerplate...
>
> But, how to proceed? I've no hope of competently reviewing 500K of changes
> (some if it is documentation, true). But it obviously have lots and lots of
> work put in to it, and I'd like to get moving on getting this checked in.
>
> I'm looking for some consensus here on whether just fixing up the javadocs
> and running the test suite is enough to at least check it in to trunk. From
> there, letting it bake for a week or two and merging into 4.x (after 4.6 is
> cut) would be the next step.
>
> It's new functionality, so it doesn't seem _too_ dangerous.
>
> See, if people don't raise objections, I can spread the blame if things go
> wrong :)



-- 
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to