It means retagging to include fixes over the week. It seems easier to tag at
release time. But I dont object. Just keep everyone informed about fixes
then.
On Oct 9, 2010 12:06 PM, "Grant Ingersoll" <[email protected]> wrote:
> We can still create one from the tag, no? Branches are only really needed
if we intend to pursue bug fix releases on that line anyway, which isn't
likely for any of these 0.x releases.
>
> On Oct 8, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
>
>> That's an oversight, and mine. I'm a bit surprised as I am a fan of tags
and
>> branches.
>>
>> I had planned to tag in a week when we have the final release rather than
>> deal with integration into a branch over a week
>> On Oct 8, 2010 8:24 PM, "Drew Farris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> svn list https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mahout/branches
>>> mahout-0.1/
>>> mahout-0.2/
>>>
>>> It appears that we never had an 0.3 branch, but I suppose we should
>>> create one for 0.4. It should be as simple as:
>>>
>>> svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mahout/trunk
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mahout/branches/mahout-0.4
>>>
>>> should I ga and do it?
>>>
>>> Drew
>
> --------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/
>
> Search the Lucene ecosystem docs using Solr/Lucene:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search
>
