The virtue as I see it is that it allows some progress on trunk while we 0.4 is frozen.
Since the week is over, it really has turned out not to matter much. On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > It means retagging to include fixes over the week. It seems easier to tag > at > release time. But I dont object. Just keep everyone informed about fixes > then. > On Oct 9, 2010 12:06 PM, "Grant Ingersoll" <[email protected]> wrote: > > We can still create one from the tag, no? Branches are only really needed > if we intend to pursue bug fix releases on that line anyway, which isn't > likely for any of these 0.x releases. > > > > On Oct 8, 2010, at 3:44 PM, Sean Owen wrote: > > > >> That's an oversight, and mine. I'm a bit surprised as I am a fan of tags > and > >> branches. > >> > >> I had planned to tag in a week when we have the final release rather > than > >> deal with integration into a branch over a week > >> On Oct 8, 2010 8:24 PM, "Drew Farris" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> svn list https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mahout/branches > >>> mahout-0.1/ > >>> mahout-0.2/ > >>> > >>> It appears that we never had an 0.3 branch, but I suppose we should > >>> create one for 0.4. It should be as simple as: > >>> > >>> svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mahout/trunk > >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mahout/branches/mahout-0.4 > >>> > >>> should I ga and do it? > >>> > >>> Drew > > > > -------------------------- > > Grant Ingersoll > > http://www.lucidimagination.com/ > > > > Search the Lucene ecosystem docs using Solr/Lucene: > > http://www.lucidimagination.com/search > > >
