I agree with Ted here, 1.0 is more of a marketing thing than anything imho. not a huge technical change.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > D has a good idea. > > 1.0 should be very nearly identical to what we have now so this isn't a big > change, but it would be very nice to provide just a bit of consistency > nevertheless. > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No, haven't tried yet. >> >> i would release it with current dependencies and switch trunk to 1.0. >> This way we will have time to work out new kinks, and people who want >> previous release would use 0.6 and people who would like to try 1.0 >> can use trunk. >> >> -d >> >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Should we be switching over to 1.0 for this release or wait? Has anyone >> tried it out? >> > >> > -Grant >> -- Twitter: @jpatanooga Solution Architect @ Cloudera hadoop: http://www.cloudera.com
